FAQ

Is there a duty to be represented by a lawyer in non-contentious proceedings?

In principle, freedom of representation applies in first instance proceedings—this means that the parties do not have to be represented, and even if they are, the representation does not have to be by a lawyer. However, there are some exceptions to this basic rule, in which either relative or absolute representation is ordered. In some of these cases, representation must even be by a lawyer or notary;such an absolute obligation to be represented by a lawyer exists, for example, at first instance in proceedings to establish the right to inheritance in excess of EUR 5,000.

 

In the second instance, there is, in principle, a relative duty of counsel or a duty of representation; in the third instance, there is an absolute duty.

Questions
about a topic?

Then contact Michael Ibesich

Personal and
competent advice

Visitors who read this question
were also looking for...

Are the negotiations public?

What is the procedure?

Can the bailiff open my front door?

Who is involved in the process?

What is the purpose of the enforcement procedure?

What is meant by out-of-court or silent settlement?

Is the hearing open to the public?

What is the liquidation procedure?

How does the restructuring process work?

Insights from the IBESICH law firm

News from the firm and legal updates in Austria.