FAQ

When is damage considered to have been caused?

In the case of causation, it is important that the injuring party has caused the damage by an act or omission. In simple terms, the question is whether the damage would have occurred even without the respective conduct (act) or whether the damage would not have occurred if the person had acted dutifully (omission). For example, a punch that leads to a broken nose is considered causal – if one had not punched, there would have been no broken nose.

 

It should be noted that damages that occur outside the realm of everyday experience are not included – this refers to those damages that occurred due to extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. Such atypical situations are not included in the compensation. For example, if you cause an accident with a car that has hidden explosives, you are not obliged to compensate for the resulting damage from the explosion.

Questions
about a topic?

Then contact Michael Ibesich

Personal and
competent advice

Visitors who read this question
were also looking for...

How is compensation for damages regulated when public bodies cause the damage?

When does my claim for damages become time-barred?

Who must pay the damages?

Are damages for grief and shock compensated?

What is replaced or how is the damage calculated?

In what form is compensation to be paid?

By whom must fault be proven?

When is fault present?

When is the conduct unlawful?

Insights from the IBESICH law firm

News from the firm and legal updates in Austria.